When Manchester City signed Erling Haaland in the summer of 2022, the football world was abuzz. A lethal striker with a reputation for scoring goals at a frightening rate, Haaland’s arrival was expected to propel City to greater heights, consolidating their dominance on both the domestic and European fronts. Fast forward a couple of years, and despite his prolific goal-scoring record, whispers have started to emerge about Haaland’s impact beyond the box. Is he evolving into a player too luxurious for Manchester City to carry? Could the Norwegian’s play style begin to become a hindrance rather than an asset?
Haaland’s Phenomenal Goal Scoring Record
Let’s first acknowledge Haaland’s undeniable prowess in front of goal. In his short time at Manchester City, the Norwegian has broken record after record. His instinct for goal, combined with his physical presence and pace, has made him one of the most feared strikers in world football. His 2022-2023 season, with 36 Premier League goals, saw him shatter the league’s record for most goals in a single season, a feat previously held by the likes of Mohamed Salah and Harry Kane.
His presence in the box demands attention. Haaland’s positioning, speed, and finishing ability have made him an invaluable asset to Manchester City, especially with the wealth of creative players that surround him—Kevin De Bruyne, Jack Grealish, Bernardo Silva, and Phil Foden. His ability to get on the end of crosses, cutbacks, and through balls has resulted in an avalanche of goals for City, lifting them to the top of the Premier League and to the very cusp of European glory.
But is this enough to justify his place in the team week in, week out, especially as Manchester City evolves into a more intricate, possession-based unit?
The Luxury Player Label
At the heart of the matter is the question: is Haaland truly a luxury player? A “luxury player” is someone whose skill set is so specialized that it demands the perfect circumstances to truly shine. Their contributions are often limited to certain phases of play—usually goalscoring—but elsewhere on the pitch, their involvement may be minimal. This is especially concerning in teams like Manchester City, where a relentless work ethic, pressing, and defensive commitment are deeply ingrained in Pep Guardiola’s tactical philosophy.
Haaland, for all his brilliance in front of goal, often seems disconnected from these other phases of play. While his teammates work tirelessly to press, create chances, and defend from the front, Haaland’s contribution in non-attacking areas is less evident. His lack of involvement in build-up play has become more apparent as City’s style has evolved. Guardiola’s system demands a level of interactivity and technical fluidity that is not always displayed by Haaland, who often relies on service from others rather than creating opportunities himself.
In a game where pressing and transitioning are vital to City’s success, Haaland’s unwillingness or inability to contribute defensively could start to feel like a liability. Guardiola’s pressing system is famously relentless. City’s forwards are expected to harry defenders, disrupt possession, and regain the ball high up the pitch. Yet Haaland’s work rate in these departments has been questioned by fans and pundits alike. His tendency to conserve energy off the ball means that, when the opposition enjoys possession, he often remains an onlooker rather than an active participant.
Haaland and the Team Dynamic
For Manchester City, pressing and ball recovery are integral to their playing style, particularly under Guardiola. When City loses the ball, they aim to win it back within seconds. This “Gegenpressing” philosophy requires players to work in sync, constantly moving and pressing as a unit to regain possession. Here, Haaland’s inefficiency in pressing becomes a potential issue. He may not exert the same intensity as his fellow attackers, making it harder for City to immediately shift into counter-pressing mode.
As the team adopts a more fluid, positional style of play, Haaland’s natural inclination to stay positioned near the goal can at times create a disconnect between him and the rest of the squad. His tendency to remain high up the pitch, ready to pounce on chances, leaves gaps in the pressing system. This requires other players to compensate for his lack of involvement off the ball, a situation that’s not sustainable in the long run.
Moreover, as City’s midfield and attacking players become more versatile and fluid in their roles, the idea of having a forward who stays static or is limited to being a “target man” becomes less and less aligned with the team’s evolving tactical identity. City’s buildup play has become more intricate, with midfielders often stepping into attacking roles. In this system, a forward like Haaland, who prefers to be fed crosses or balls in behind, might look out of place when compared to other attacking forwards who engage more in the link-up play, like Foden, Grealish, or even De Bruyne.
The Danger of Becoming an Undroppable Luxury
As Haaland continues to bang in the goals, his position in the team remains relatively secure. However, a deeper issue starts to emerge when you consider the bigger picture. If Manchester City wants to continue progressing as a team and adapt to the demands of the modern game—especially with Guardiola’s preference for fluidity, movement, and defensive work rate—they might find themselves in a difficult situation with Haaland.
The problem with luxury players is that their effectiveness is often tied to how well the team can service them. If the supply line to Haaland is interrupted, or if City struggles to break down deep-lying defenses, his presence on the pitch becomes less meaningful. He is less involved in the buildup, less able to influence the game in transition, and less effective at linking play. This could expose City’s reliance on him for goals, turning him into a player who offers little more than the occasional strike on goal.
As City moves into more complex phases of their tactical evolution, the question becomes: can they afford to carry a player who does little outside of scoring? If Haaland’s goals dry up, what else does he bring to the table? While it’s hard to argue against his importance when he’s scoring, it’s equally crucial to acknowledge that when the team needs to evolve beyond one-dimensional attacking options, Haaland’s limitations could become a serious concern.
Haaland’s Future at Manchester City: Adapting or Moving On?
The big question now is: can Haaland adapt to Manchester City’s evolving tactical needs, or will he become a square peg in a round hole?
If Haaland is to remain at Manchester City and continue contributing to the team’s success, he will need to evolve. He cannot be allowed to stagnate as a player who is only effective when the ball is delivered to him on a silver platter. He must begin to find ways to become more involved in build-up play, press from the front, and contribute to the defensive structure. Only then can he become the complete forward that Guardiola so desires.
On the other hand, if Haaland struggles to adapt, City may find themselves in a dilemma. His value, both in terms of performance and transfer market potential, could start to decline. It would not be the first time a superstar player has outgrown their team, or that a team has outgrown a superstar. As the season progresses, the club may have to seriously consider whether they can continue to carry Haaland as a luxury player—especially if he’s not contributing in other aspects of the game.
The Verdict: Luxury or Liability?
In conclusion, while Haaland is undoubtedly one of the most gifted goal-scorers in world football, his future at Manchester City is far from guaranteed. The team’s dynamic is changing, and if Haaland fails to adapt to these changes, he risks becoming a luxury player that City cannot afford to carry. Football is no longer just about goals; it’s about contribution in all phases of the game. Haaland’s ability to evolve will determine whether he remains an essential player for Manchester City or whether his role becomes increasingly expendable.
Be the first to comment